AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
3040 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX
+526%
12.63 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Sep 2021
FireStream
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
70
1440
Shading Units
4480
72
TMUs
280
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
GA100
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.4
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
5.0
Shader Model
N/A
