AMD FireStream 9350 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1400 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
+6200%
2.016 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Jan 2009
FireStream
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
40
72
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
32W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
RV620
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
RC620 PRO
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1
