AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1630 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
928 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 's Advantages
Released 12 years late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
+10%
2.016 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1630
1.828 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Jun 2022
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1740 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
1440
Shading Units
512
72
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.56 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.656 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI1x HDMI 2.01x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
TU117
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
TU117-150-KA-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.8
