AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
672 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6400
+77%
3.58 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Jan 2022
FireStream
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2331 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2331 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
768
72
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.59 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.161 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.580 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
Navi 24
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL-W
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
