AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA T400
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 2GB VRAM T400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
1056 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
+84%
2.016 TFLOPS
T400
1.094 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
May 2021
FireStream
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
420 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
1440
Shading Units
384
72
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
TU117
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
