Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9370 vs ATI FireGL V8650

AMD FireStream 9370 vs ATI FireGL V8650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9370 +500%
2.64 TFLOPS
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Aug 2007
FireStream
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
320
80
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

225W
TDP
Unknown
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
R600
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy