AMD FireStream 9370 vs ATI FirePro V3900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1120 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Lower TDP (50W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9370
+323%
2.64 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Feb 2012
FireStream
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
480
80
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
225W
TDP
50W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
Turks
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
Turks GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0
