AMD FireStream 9370 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 590 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
1088 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 365W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (164.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9370
+112%
2.64 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 590
1.244 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Mar 2011
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
854 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
164.0GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
1600
Shading Units
512
80
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.46 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.91 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1244 GFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
155.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
365W
550 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
3x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
GF110
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
3 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
5.0
Shader Model
5.1
