Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9370 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition

AMD FireStream 9370 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
64 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1058MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
Lower TDP (195W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9370
2.64 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition +23%
3.25 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Apr 2013
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1006 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1058 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
1536
80
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.86 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
135.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.250 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
195W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
GK104
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
GK104-400-A2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy