Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9370 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

AMD FireStream 9370 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1188MHz
Lower TDP (90W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9370 +44%
2.64 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950
1.825 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Aug 2015
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1024 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1188 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.02 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.02 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.825 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
90W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
GM206
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
GM206-250-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
5.0
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net