AMD FireStream 9370 vs NVIDIA TITAN Ada
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 and 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 800W)
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
16832 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9370
2.64 TFLOPS
TITAN Ada
+3418%
92.9 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Unknown
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2235 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6X
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
1.15TB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
144
1600
Shading Units
18432
80
TMUs
576
32
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
144
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
483.8 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1452 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
92.90 TFLOPS
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
92.90 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1452 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
800W
550 W
Suggested PSU
1200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
AD102
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
AD102-450-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.8
