AMD FireStream 9370 vs AMD FirePro D300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 and 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
320 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (162.6GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9370
+21%
2.64 TFLOPS
FirePro D300
2.176 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Jan 2014
FireStream
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
162.6GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
1280
80
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.176 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
136.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL
(215-0828073)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1
