Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM vs AMD FirePro R5000

NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM vs AMD FirePro R5000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 OEM and 2GB VRAM FirePro R5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro R5000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 210 OEM
0.035 TFLOPS
FirePro R5000 +3520%
1.267 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2009
Release Date
Feb 2013
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro Remote
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
12
16
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.900 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
3.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
Pitcairn
-
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

31W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy