Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM vs AMD FirePro W7000

NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM vs AMD FirePro W7000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 OEM and 4GB VRAM FirePro W7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro W7000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1264 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 210 OEM
0.035 TFLOPS
FirePro W7000 +6848%
2.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2009
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
20
16
Shading Units
1280
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.900 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
3.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.432 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
152.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
Pitcairn
-
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

31W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy