Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM vs AMD Radeon R7 240

NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM vs AMD Radeon R7 240

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 OEM and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 31W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 210 OEM
0.035 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 240 +1325%
0.499 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2009
Release Date
Oct 2013
GeForce 200
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
730 MHz
-
Boost Clock
780 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
5
16
Shading Units
320
8
TMUs
20
4
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.900 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
3.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
Oland
-
GPU Variant
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

31W
TDP
30W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy