NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI vs Intel Arc A750
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI and 8GB VRAM Arc A750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 225W)
Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3568 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
Arc A750
+49042%
17.2 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Oct 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2050 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
3584
8
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
28
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.900 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
268.8 GPixel/s
3.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
537.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
34.41 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.20 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.150 TFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
