NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI vs AMD FireStream 9350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1424 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350
+5660%
2.016 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Jun 2010
GeForce 200
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
18
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
1440
8
TMUs
72
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.900 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
3.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
Cypress
-
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0
