NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
880 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
+8040%
2.849 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Apr 2020
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
14
16
Shading Units
896
8
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.900 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
3.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
TU117
-
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
