Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 Rev. 2 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
880 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 210 Rev. 2
0.039 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 +7551%
2.984 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2009
Release Date
Apr 2019
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1485 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
896
8
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
53.28 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.24 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.967 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.984 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
93.24 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
TU117
GT218-325-B1
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

31W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy