CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 Rev. 2 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
Lower TDP (31W vs 171W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
200 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210 Rev. 2
0.039 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
+1274%
0.536 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 Rev. 2
VS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
448bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
27
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
216
8
TMUs
72
4
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
GT200B
GT218-325-B1
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Board Design
31W
TDP
171W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT
2
NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
3
NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon HD 6570 OEM
4
NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
5
NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon HD 7750
6
NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2
7
NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 OEM
8
NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
9
NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA RTX A4000H
10
NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
2
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
3
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
4
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
5
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
6
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
7
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
8
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
9
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
10
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy