Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE

NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 Rev. 2 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 7900 GRE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 260W)
AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2245MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
5104 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 210 Rev. 2
0.039 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7900 GRE +117797%
45.98 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2009
Release Date
Jul 2023
GeForce 200
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1287 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2245 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
80
16
Shading Units
5120
8
TMUs
320
4
ROPs
160
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
80
-
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
32 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
359.2 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
718.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
91.96 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.98 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1437 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Navi 31
GT218-325-B1
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

31W
TDP
260W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy