Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs ATI FirePro V3750

NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs ATI FirePro V3750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Lower TDP (31W vs 48W)
ATI FirePro V3750 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (22.40GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
FirePro V3750 +802%
0.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2009
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
320
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

31W
TDP
48W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
RV730
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
RV730 PRO (215-0719056)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy