Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs AMD FirePro W8000

NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs AMD FirePro W8000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1776 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
FirePro W8000 +8171%
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2009
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
1792
8
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

31W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Tahiti
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy