Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2288 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +14587%
5.728 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2009
Release Date
Apr 2017
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
36
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
2304
8
TMUs
144
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

31W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Ellesmere
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy