Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 360 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 85W)
AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (104.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 360 OEM +4035%
1.613 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2009
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce 200
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
104.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.80 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

31W
TDP
85W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Tobago
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy