Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP

NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
16 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (31W vs 41W)
ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.48GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2009
Release Date
Oct 2007
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon R500 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
390 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
12.48GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
-
8
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
RV530
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Board Design

31W
TDP
41W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
Floppy

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3
OpenGL
2.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy