Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs NVIDIA TITAN Ada

NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs NVIDIA TITAN Ada

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 800W)
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1152GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
18416 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
TITAN Ada +238105%
92.9 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2009
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2235 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
1152GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
144
16
Shading Units
18432
8
TMUs
576
4
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
144
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
483.8 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1452 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
92.90 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
92.90 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1452 GFLOPS

Board Design

31W
TDP
800W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
AD102
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
AD102-450-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy