Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 310 OEM and 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 450W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.01TB/s vs 5.328GB/s)
16368 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 310 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4090 +183411%
82.58 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2009
Release Date
Sep 2022
GeForce 300
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2235 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
333 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6X
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
5.328GB/s
Bandwidth
1.01TB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
128
16
Shading Units
16384
8
TMUs
512
4
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
128
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.356 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
443.5 GPixel/s
4.712 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1290 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
82.58 TFLOPS
44.86 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
82.58 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1290 GFLOPS

Board Design

31W
TDP
450W
200 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
AD102
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
AD102-300-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy