Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100

NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 310 OEM and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 5100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 75W)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock1086MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 5.328GB/s)
1776 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 310 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 5100 +8548%
3.892 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2009
Release Date
Nov 2016
GeForce 300
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
713 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1086 MHz
333 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
5.328GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
1792
8
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.356 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
34.75 GPixel/s
4.712 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
121.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.892 TFLOPS
44.86 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.892 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
243.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

31W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Ellesmere
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
Polaris 10 PRO GL (215-0876144)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy