CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM
AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 310 OEM and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 450 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (72.00GB/s vs 5.328GB/s)
496 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 310 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 450 OEM
+2004%
0.947 TFLOPS
GeForce 310 OEM
VS
Radeon R7 450 OEM
Graphics Card
Nov 2009
Release Date
Jun 2016
GeForce 300
Generation
Arctic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
333 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
5.328GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.356 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.80 GPixel/s
4.712 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
44.86 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
947.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
59.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
Cape Verde
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM
2
NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 550 512SP
3
NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 PCIe x1
4
NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT
5
NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
6
NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
7
NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
8
NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2
9
NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
10
NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 390X
Related News
1
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
2
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
3
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
4
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
5
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
6
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
7
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
8
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
9
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
10
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy