Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 315 OEM and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
16 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.80GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
Lower TDP (32W vs 33W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Jan 2007
GeForce 300
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x1

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
600 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
-
8
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

2.356 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
4.712 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
44.86 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
RV516
GT218-300-B1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

33W
TDP
32W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3
OpenGL
2.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy