NVIDIA GeForce 315M vs Intel Arc Pro A30M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 315M and 4GB VRAM Arc Pro A30M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 315M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (14W vs 50W)
Intel Arc Pro A30M 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1008 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 315M
0.039 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A30M
+10402%
4.096 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2011
Release Date
Aug 2022
GeForce 300M
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
1024
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.424 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
4.848 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
38.78 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS
Board Design
14W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
DG2-128
N11M-GE
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
