CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro A300
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro A300
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition
AMD FirePro A300
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 65W)
AMD FirePro A300 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock905MHz
336 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
0.091 TFLOPS
FirePro A300
+663%
0.695 TFLOPS
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
VS
FirePro A300
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 300M
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
760 MHz
-
Boost Clock
905 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
4
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.240 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.72 GTexel/s
-
-
-
91.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
695.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
23W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
C89
GPU Name
Devastator
MCP89
GPU Variant
A300
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
-
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
32 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
1.303 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
246 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon HD 7660G IGP
2
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs Intel GMA 3100
3
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon HD 8450G IGP
4
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs NVIDIA ION 2
5
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs Intel HD Graphics 4400
6
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Vega 3
7
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics
8
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs Intel HD Graphics 5000
9
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs Intel UHD Graphics P630
10
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs Intel Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile
Related News
1
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
2
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
3
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
4
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
5
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
6
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
7
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
8
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
9
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
10
World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy