Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro A300

NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro A300

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 65W)
AMD FirePro A300 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock905MHz
336 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
0.091 TFLOPS
FirePro A300 +663%
0.695 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 300M
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
760 MHz
-
Boost Clock
905 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
4
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.240 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.72 GTexel/s
-
-
-
91.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
695.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

23W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

C89
GPU Name
Devastator
MCP89
GPU Variant
A300
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
-
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
32 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
1.303 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
246 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy