Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs Intel Iris Graphics 6100

NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs Intel Iris Graphics 6100

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Graphics 6100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Iris Graphics 6100 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1000MHz
336 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 23W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
0.091 TFLOPS
Iris Graphics 6100 +743%
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Sep 2014
GeForce 300M
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.000 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
91.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
192.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

23W
TDP
15W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

C89
GPU Name
Broadwell GT3
MCP89
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 8.0
-
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
Unknown
100 mm²
Die Size
133 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.0
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy