CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon HD 7660D IGP
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon HD 7660D IGP
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition
AMD Radeon HD 7660D IGP
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition and 0System Shared VRAM Radeon HD 7660D IGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 100W)
AMD Radeon HD 7660D IGP 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
336 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
0.091 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 7660D IGP
+541%
0.584 TFLOPS
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
VS
Radeon HD 7660D IGP
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Oct 2012
GeForce 300M
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
IGP
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
4
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
6
48
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.080 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.24 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
91.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
583.7 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
C89
GPU Name
Devastator
MCP89
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
-
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
32 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
1.303 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
246 mm²
Board Design
23W
TDP
100W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon HD 8250 IGP
2
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs Intel UHD Graphics 24EU
3
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce G205M
4
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP
5
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon HD 8670D IGP
6
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Tegra 3 GPU
7
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 8300
8
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs Intel HD Graphics 5500
9
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon 660M
10
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon HD 7520G IGP
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy