NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics P6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock800MHz
336 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 23W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
0.091 TFLOPS
Iris Pro Graphics P6300
+574%
0.614 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Sep 2014
GeForce 300M
Generation
HD Graphics-W
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
800 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
91.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
23W
TDP
15W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
C89
GPU Name
Broadwell GT3e
MCP89
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 8.0
-
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
Unknown
100 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.0
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
