NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU Mobile
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics 96EU Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU Mobile 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1300MHz
720 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 23W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
0.091 TFLOPS
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU Mobile
+2094%
1.997 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Jan 2023
GeForce 300M
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
768
16
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
62.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.994 TFLOPS
91.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.997 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
537.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
23W
TDP
15W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
C89
GPU Name
Raptor Lake GT1
MCP89
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.2
-
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
Unknown
100 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
