Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 410M vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X

NVIDIA GeForce 410M vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 410M and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 64X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 410M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1468MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
4048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 410M
0.11 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega 64X +10836%
12.03 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Mar 2019
GeForce 400M
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1250 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1468 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
1
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
4096
8
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.148 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
93.95 GPixel/s
4.592 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
375.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.05 TFLOPS
110.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.03 TFLOPS
9.176 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
751.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

12W
TDP
250W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
Vega 10
N12M-GS
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy