Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 810M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce 810M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce 810M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 810M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 50W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 112% (2010MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 810M
0.73 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +1591%
12.35 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 800M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

835 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
384
Shading Units
3072
32
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
30.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
729.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
30.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy