Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 820A vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce 820A vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 820A and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 820A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1696 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 820A
0.298 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition +903%
2.989 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce 800A
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
28
96
Shading Units
1792
16
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

3.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.69 GPixel/s
12.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.41 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
297.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.989 TFLOPS
24.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
373.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF117
GPU Name
Amethyst
N15V-GM
GPU Variant
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
5 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Board Design

15W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy