Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 825M vs Intel Arc Pro A30M

NVIDIA GeForce 825M vs Intel Arc Pro A30M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 825M and 4GB VRAM Arc Pro A30M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 825M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 50W)
Intel Arc Pro A30M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 113% (2000MHz vs 941MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 825M
0.723 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A30M +466%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Aug 2022
GeForce 800M
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
941 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.528 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
30.11 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
722.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
30.11 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Board Design

33W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK208
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Kepler 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.02 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
87 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy