Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 825M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q

NVIDIA GeForce 825M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 825M and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 825M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 80W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 55% (1455MHz vs 941MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
9344 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 825M
0.723 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4090 Max Q +3815%
28.31 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Jan 2023
GeForce 800M
Generation
GeForce 40 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
941 MHz
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
76
384
Shading Units
9728
32
TMUs
304
8
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.528 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
163.0 GPixel/s
30.11 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
442.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.31 TFLOPS
722.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
28.31 TFLOPS
30.11 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
442.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

33W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK208
GPU Name
AD103
-
GPU Variant
GN21-X11
Kepler 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
4 nm
1.02 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
87 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy