Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 825M vs ATI Radeon E4690 MXM

NVIDIA GeForce 825M vs ATI Radeon E4690 MXM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 825M and 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 825M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock941MHz
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
64 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon E4690 MXM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (22.40GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
Lower TDP (30W vs 33W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 825M +88%
0.723 TFLOPS
Radeon E4690 MXM
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Jun 2009
GeForce 800M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
-
941 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
320
32
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.528 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
30.11 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
722.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
30.11 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

33W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GK208
GPU Name
RV730
-
GPU Variant
RV730 XT E4690 (215-0729055)
Kepler 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.02 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
87 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy