Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 825M vs AMD Radeon Pro 460

NVIDIA GeForce 825M vs AMD Radeon Pro 460

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 825M and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 460 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 825M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 4% (941MHz vs 907MHz)
Lower TDP (33W vs 35W)
AMD Radeon Pro 460 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (81.28GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 825M
0.723 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 460 +156%
1.858 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Oct 2016
GeForce 800M
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
850 MHz
941 MHz
Boost Clock
907 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
81.28GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.528 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.51 GPixel/s
30.11 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.05 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.858 TFLOPS
722.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.858 TFLOPS
30.11 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
116.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

33W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK208
GPU Name
Baffin
-
GPU Variant
Baffin XT
Kepler 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.02 billion
Transistors
3 billion
87 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy