Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 825M vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56

NVIDIA GeForce 825M vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 825M and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 56 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 825M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 210W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 33% (1250MHz vs 941MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (402.4GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 825M
0.723 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega 56 +1139%
8.96 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Aug 2017
GeForce 800M
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
1138 MHz
941 MHz
Boost Clock
1250 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
786 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
402.4GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
56
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
3584
32
TMUs
224
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.528 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
80.00 GPixel/s
30.11 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
280.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
17.92 TFLOPS
722.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.960 TFLOPS
30.11 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
560.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

33W
TDP
210W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK208
GPU Name
Vega 10
-
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XL (215-0894216)
Kepler 2.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.02 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
87 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy