CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM GeForce 8300 GS and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
18168 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8300 GS
0.015 TFLOPS
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
+606966%
91.06 TFLOPS
GeForce 8300 GS
VS
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Graphics Card
Apr 2007
Release Date
Dec 2022
GeForce 8
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s
Render Config
1
SM Count
142
-
Compute Units
-
8
Shading Units
18176
8
TMUs
568
4
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
Theoretical Performance
1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
14.69 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
4 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
608 mm²
Board Design
40W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT vs NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS
2
AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS
3
AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS
4
AMD Radeon 550 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS
5
AMD Radeon HD 7850 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS
7
AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo vs NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS
8
NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS vs AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
9
NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS vs ATI Radeon HD 2400
10
NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS vs AMD Radeon R7 265
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy