CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 OEM
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 OEM
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2
NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 610 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 29W)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 OEM 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (8.000GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
40 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2
0.022 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 610 OEM
+422%
0.115 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2
VS
GeForce GT 610 OEM
Graphics Card
Dec 2007
Release Date
Sep 2012
GeForce 8
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s
Render Config
1
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
8
Shading Units
48
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
2.268 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
2.268 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
22.40 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
115.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
9.600 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
GF119
-
GPU Variant
GF119 B1
Tesla
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Board Design
25W
TDP
29W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 8 GB GA102 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2
3
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1
4
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X
5
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
6
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2
7
NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 OEM
8
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GS
9
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon HD 7850
10
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 5870 Mac Edition
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy