CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
184 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2
0.022 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
+2068%
0.477 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2
VS
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
Graphics Card
Dec 2007
Release Date
Jul 2008
GeForce 8
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
448bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
1
SM Count
24
-
Compute Units
-
8
Shading Units
192
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
16 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
2.268 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
2.268 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
22.40 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-103-B3
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Board Design
25W
TDP
182W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
2
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X
3
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce G100 OEM
4
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GS
5
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 4870
6
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT
7
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB 9Gbps
8
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 vs AMD FirePro W4000
9
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320
10
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 3650 AGP
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy