CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Lower TDP (25W vs 45W)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.60GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
112 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2
0.022 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
+663%
0.168 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2
VS
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
Graphics Card
Dec 2007
Release Date
Feb 2008
GeForce 8
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
1
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
3
8
Shading Units
120
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
16 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
2.268 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
2.268 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.600 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
22.40 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
168.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
RV630
-
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Board Design
25W
TDP
45W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
2
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X
3
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce G100 OEM
4
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 4870
5
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB 9Gbps
6
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 8 GB GDDR5X
7
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT
8
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 5970
9
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition
10
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 4770
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy