CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 and 1792MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Lower TDP (25W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM 's Advantages
More VRAM (1792GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.9GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
184 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
0.02 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
+1975%
0.415 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
VS
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
Graphics Card
Jul 2010
Release Date
Dec 2009
GeForce 8
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1008 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
1792MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
448bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
112.9GB/s
Render Config
1
SM Count
24
-
Compute Units
-
8
Shading Units
192
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.50 GPixel/s
2.080 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.15 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
19.68 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
414.7 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
51.84 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
GT200B
8400GS-225-B1
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Board Design
25W
TDP
182W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104
2
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon HD 7730
3
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs ATI Radeon HD 5970
4
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
5
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
6
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 Mac Edition
7
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled
8
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs ATI Radeon HD 3690
9
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
10
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
2
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
3
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
4
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
5
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
6
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
7
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
8
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
9
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
10
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy